Coronet Peak vs Mt Hutt
Coronet Peak vs Mt Hutt compared side by side: 40 km vs 35 km of slopes, 8 vs 4 lifts, top elevation 1,649 m vs 2,086 m. See which resort suits you.
| Statistic |
 Coronet Peak
New Zealand
|
Mt Hutt
New Zealand
|
|---|---|---|
| Total slopes | 40 km ▲ | 35 km |
| Easy (blue) slopes | – | – |
| Intermediate (red) slopes | – | – |
| Expert (black) slopes | – | – |
| Share of easy slopes | – | – |
| Ski lifts | 8 ▲ | 4 |
| Snow parks | – | – |
| Base elevation | 1,168 m | 1,500 m ▲ |
| Top elevation | 1,649 m | 2,086 m ▲ |
| Vertical drop | 481 m | 586 m ▲ |
| Season | June – October | June – October |
| Ski area | Coronet Peak | Mt Hutt |
| Known for | Après-ski · Scenic views | Snow-sure · Scenic views |
The verdict
- Coronet Peak is the bigger ski area with 40 km of slopes versus 35 km (a similar size).
- Mt Hutt goes higher: its top station is at 2,086 m compared with 1,649 m, which usually means more reliable snow late in the season.
- Coronet Peak has the larger lift network with 8 lifts.
Coronet Peak vs Mt Hutt: quick answers
Coronet Peak is bigger with 40 km of marked slopes, compared with 35 km.
Mt Hutt has the higher top station at 2,086 m versus 1,649 m.